PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
^HSI vs. AACFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^HSI and AACFX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

^HSI vs. AACFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hang Seng Index (^HSI) and Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
14.30%
-2.20%
^HSI
AACFX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^HSI:

0.92

AACFX:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

^HSI:

1.41

AACFX:

0.80

Omega Ratio

^HSI:

1.18

AACFX:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

^HSI:

0.42

AACFX:

0.19

Martin Ratio

^HSI:

2.46

AACFX:

0.93

Ulcer Index

^HSI:

9.48%

AACFX:

11.48%

Daily Std Dev

^HSI:

25.05%

AACFX:

23.19%

Max Drawdown

^HSI:

-91.54%

AACFX:

-72.17%

Current Drawdown

^HSI:

-39.38%

AACFX:

-51.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^HSI achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than AACFX's -1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ^HSI has underperformed AACFX with an annualized return of -2.15%, while AACFX has yielded a comparatively higher -1.18% annualized return.


^HSI

YTD

0.18%

1M

1.91%

6M

13.95%

1Y

31.28%

5Y*

-6.81%

10Y*

-2.15%

AACFX

YTD

-1.65%

1M

-2.00%

6M

-2.20%

1Y

9.43%

5Y*

-7.02%

10Y*

-1.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^HSI vs. AACFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^HSI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^HSI is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^HSI is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^HSI is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^HSI is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^HSI is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^HSI is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AACFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AACFX is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AACFX is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AACFX is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AACFX is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AACFX is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AACFX is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^HSI vs. AACFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hang Seng Index (^HSI) and Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^HSI, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.501.180.52
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^HSI, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.001.730.89
The chart of Omega ratio for ^HSI, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market1.001.201.401.231.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^HSI, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.000.540.21
The chart of Martin ratio for ^HSI, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.971.00
^HSI
AACFX

The current ^HSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the AACFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^HSI and AACFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.18
0.52
^HSI
AACFX

Drawdowns

^HSI vs. AACFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^HSI drawdown since its inception was -91.54%, which is greater than AACFX's maximum drawdown of -72.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^HSI and AACFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-39.10%
-51.68%
^HSI
AACFX

Volatility

^HSI vs. AACFX - Volatility Comparison

Hang Seng Index (^HSI) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX) at 4.33%. This indicates that ^HSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AACFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.71%
4.33%
^HSI
AACFX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab